Conclusions
First, given the very small amount of data that SL had available in the 88 x 57 px images, I think it did a good job of upscaling to provide a reasonable image when I pasted the small graphic onto a large object in SL. Whatever algorithms SL is using when they downsize or upsize images to be viewed inworld, they do present good quality images for most people using the program.
With respect to the use of bicubic or bilinear resampling, to my eye, I think the edge goes to bi-cubic resampling, as evidenced by the greater definition and higher contrast in both the enlarged samples and the images displayed in SL.
The difference is most noticeable in the top eyelashes towards the outer corner of the eye.
Of course, this is a matter of taste, but generally more pronounced detail at the pixel level leads to a better overall image when viewed in SL.
- Rob Fossett
2023 08 15
|